comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Question on Ada style.
@ 1986-10-30 17:46 "BUD::PEARSON"
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: "BUD::PEARSON" @ 1986-10-30 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)



    A few coworkers and I have noticed something odd happening to the
Ada programs we write: more and more often, the top-level ("main")
procedure turns out to "do nothing itself".  It ends with

                  begin
                     null;
                  end;

while the "real work" is done by generic packages instantiated
in its declarative part.
    Have we wandered off the path of righteousness? or is THIS the
path of righteousness? Is there a cogent (preferably bumper-sticker-
sized) explanation why it SHOULD be this way, that we can give the
old, conservative guy across the trailer, who suspects that we've been
seduced by a fascination for the arcane subtleties of the Ada language?

  -  Peter
(pearson%anchor.decnet@lll-icdc.arpa)
------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~1986-10-30 17:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1986-10-30 17:46 Question on Ada style "BUD::PEARSON"

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox