From: larry@JPL-VLSI.ARPA
Subject: Alsys question + CAIS comment
Date: Tue, 24-Jun-86 21:28:36 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Tue Jun 24 21:28:36 1986
Message-ID: <8606250240.AA04395@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
One group I'm helping has an Alsys Ada compiler for the AT and needs to
import math and other routines. Has anyone solved this problem already? If
so, we'd appreciate whatever help you can give (even copies of sample code
without explanation would be helpful).
==========================================================================
Several people have (rightly) taken me to task for suggesting a requirement
for the Space Station SW Development Environment of "an operating system
easily updated to the CAIS." Of course, that has to be restated in more
specific terms, and in such a way that compliance can be measured.
However, I doubt if any input to the Space Station management would
have any effect. They seem to be firmly committed to IBM mainframes running
MVS. It's what they've used with much success in the past, and people in the
space program are (contrary to popular expectation) extremely conservative.
Further, there are some very rational reasons for wanting IBM hardware and
MVS operating system. Most of their people are expert in their use and won't
require expensive, time-consuming re-training with all the attendant chances
for catastrophe before becoming expert; a whole suite of SW-engineering
tools are available from the shuttle program; and they don't have to worry
about the vendor going out of business.
Actually, I suspect the probability of many people ever using the CAIS is
pretty small. The CAIS has a competitor that's already won the de facto
status of an industry-wide standard, being used by 70-80% of all programmers
in the U.S. And its supported by a vendor which stands to lose billions
of dollars each year if an operating system standard is chosen that
makes it easy to port SW to other vendors hardware. No, it isn't Unix and
AT&T (which many supporters of the CAIS seem to consider their bete noire,
judging from all the argument against it I hear). Its MVS and IBM.
Larry @ jpl-vlsi.ARPA
next reply other threads:[~1986-06-25 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1986-06-25 1:28 larry [this message]
1986-06-25 20:42 ` Alsys question + CAIS comment alden
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox