From: serafini@ames-aero (DAVE SERAFINI)
Subject: Fortran vs Ada (+1 flame)
Date: Wed, 21-May-86 01:27:00 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Wed May 21 01:27:00 1986
Message-ID: <8605210500.AA17295@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
>>From: (I don't remember)
>>Subj: Ada vs Fortran
>> Does anyone know of features which are in Fortran 77 which
>> are not directly found, or can be similuated in, Ada?
>From: alice!ark@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
>Subj: Re: Ada vs Fortran
>
>Sure, that's easy.
>If I have a Fortran program and only an Ada compiler, I can't
>compile and run my program.
>
>(if you think I'm just being flip, think again)
But!!!!
If you have a Fortran-->Ada translator written in Ada, then you CAN
compile and run your program.
So the original question is not so easily written-off. (And in my opinion,
shouldn't be, because the answer(s) are important to the success of Ada
in the scientific/engineering world).
Flame on ----
I for one am getting a little tired of short, nasty, replies from
"real-annoyed-sender"s who pull the reply trigger before they stop
and look at what they're shooting. I've seen a lot of this lately,
mostly on other lists, but I think it is inappropriate to the positive
exchange of information that these lists are supposed to be for.
My apologies to innocent bystanders with singed terminals.
Flame off.
<dbs>
David B. Serafini serafini@ames-aero.ARPA
NASA/Ames Research Center serafini%far@ames-io.ARPA
Moffett Field, CA {ihnp4,decwrl,allegra}!ames!amelia!serafini
The opinions above are my own, ..... (I hate this bullshit)
------
next reply other threads:[~1986-05-21 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1986-05-21 5:27 DAVE SERAFINI [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1986-05-23 21:30 Fortran vs Ada (+1 flame) mike feldman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox