* British Validations
@ 1986-03-24 22:22 Geoff Mendal
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Geoff Mendal @ 1986-03-24 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
I find the news of having two mutually exclusive
ACVC's disturbing. I would very much like someone
to comment on why there will soon be two ACVC suites
floating around. What's the deal?
In any case, as most of know anyway, just because a compiler
passes the ACVC, doesn't make it usable. I have walked the
SIGAda halls and "evaluated" many validated compilers. As
you would expect, some of them are wonderful, and others I
found unusable. (No names will be mentioned.) Ada compiler
consumers should still beware of what they are buying, even
with an ACVC label on it. gom
-------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1986-03-24 22:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1986-03-24 22:22 British Validations Geoff Mendal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox