From: Mendal@SU-SIERRA.ARPA (Geoff Mendal)
Subject: British Validations
Date: Mon, 24-Mar-86 17:22:25 EST [thread overview]
Date: Mon Mar 24 17:22:25 1986
Message-ID: <8603250130.AA08557@ucbvax.berkeley.edu> (raw)
I find the news of having two mutually exclusive
ACVC's disturbing. I would very much like someone
to comment on why there will soon be two ACVC suites
floating around. What's the deal?
In any case, as most of know anyway, just because a compiler
passes the ACVC, doesn't make it usable. I have walked the
SIGAda halls and "evaluated" many validated compilers. As
you would expect, some of them are wonderful, and others I
found unusable. (No names will be mentioned.) Ada compiler
consumers should still beware of what they are buying, even
with an ACVC label on it. gom
-------
reply other threads:[~1986-03-24 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox