From: merlin@annwfn.com (Fred McCall)
Subject: Re: Mut. Recurs. in Ada9X w/o Breaking Encapsulation?
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 1994 10:24:35 -0400
Date: 1994-10-15T10:24:35-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85CF23BD4DE@annwfn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1994Oct8.135052.10923@inca.comlab.ox.ac.uk
In <1994Oct8.135052.10923@inca.comlab.ox.ac.uk> lady0065@sable.ox.ac.uk David J Hopwood writes:
>Absolutely right. The difference between C++ and Ada9X in this case is that
>Ada9X has separate compilation, and C++ doesn't.
Since when? Every C++ compiler I've ever used had separate
compilation. Perhaps you've redefined the word since I went to school?
--
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
merlin@annwfn.com -- I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
next parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-15 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1994Oct8.135052.10923@inca.comlab.ox.ac.uk>
1994-10-15 14:24 ` Fred McCall [this message]
[not found] <1994Oct8.171744.26604@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>
[not found] ` <377t87$t7n@network.ucsd.edu>
1994-10-12 21:18 ` Mut. Recurs. in Ada9X w/o Breaking Encapsulation? John Volan
1994-10-13 11:24 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox