comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: leake@cme.nbs.gov (Stephe Leake)
Subject: Re: Another reason for goto
Date: 24 Jan 89 16:58:12 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <858@primus.cme.nbs.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: billwolf@hubcap.clemson.edu's message of 19 Jan 89 17:46:52 GMT


What does it actually _cost_ us to have goto in the language? If you
never use it, the only cost is the paragraph or so in the LRM, and
some code (never executed) in the compiler. For such a small cost, why
should we bother removing it?

I know of one CASE tool that generates Ada code, with lots of goto's.
Yes, you would not code it that way if you were writing Ada directly,
but that's the point of a CASE tool; it gives you a different
(hopefully better/more productive/more readable) way to write code.
Personally, I prefer Ada, but I do not want to discourage work on
better CASE tools.

Stephe Leake 	(301) 975-3431 		leake@cme.nbs.gov
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(formerly National Bureau of Standards)
Rm. B-124, Bldg. 220
Gaithersburg, MD  20899

      reply	other threads:[~1989-01-24 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1989-01-17 18:23 Another reason for goto Marc.Graham
1989-01-17 23:03 ` Ada and the infamous goto William Thomas Wolfe,2847,
1989-01-19  1:48   ` Bob Hathaway
1989-01-18  4:43 ` Another reason for goto William A. Bralick
1989-01-18 16:11   ` Stephe Leake
1989-01-19 17:46     ` William Thomas Wolfe,2847,
1989-01-24 16:58       ` Stephe Leake [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox