* ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex)
@ 2015-08-26 11:20 tonyg
2015-08-31 23:10 ` Randy Brukardt
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tonyg @ 2015-08-26 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Does any one if this is being ported to ARM or (even better) can you mix up arm and intel partitions?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex)
2015-08-26 11:20 ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex) tonyg
@ 2015-08-31 23:10 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-09-01 12:39 ` brbarkstrom
2015-09-16 10:41 ` tonyg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randy Brukardt @ 2015-08-31 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
"tonyg" <tonythegair@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:399cb225-0753-458e-bd71-0b48f157d595@googlegroups.com...
>
> Does any one if this is being ported to ARM or (even better) can you mix
> up arm and intel partitions?
Since Annex E is only intended for homogeneous partitions (that is, all
partitions running on the same processor and target OS), it doesn't make
sense to "mix up ARM and Intel partitions".
Specifically, see paragraph 6 in the introduction to Annex E. Since this is
a "permission", an implementation could try to support a mixed system, but
it would only work if all targets use the same mapping of object
representations (that is, size of integers, mapping of components, and so
on). That's likely to be pretty limiting on the implementation for each
target.
. Randy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex)
2015-08-26 11:20 ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex) tonyg
2015-08-31 23:10 ` Randy Brukardt
@ 2015-09-01 12:39 ` brbarkstrom
2015-09-16 10:41 ` tonyg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: brbarkstrom @ 2015-09-01 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 7:20:33 AM UTC-4, tonyg wrote:
> Does any one if this is being ported to ARM or (even better) can you mix up arm and intel partitions?
You might try taking a look at PolyORB, which is intended to
deal with this kind of situation.
Bruce B.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex)
2015-08-26 11:20 ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex) tonyg
2015-08-31 23:10 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-09-01 12:39 ` brbarkstrom
@ 2015-09-16 10:41 ` tonyg
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: tonyg @ 2015-09-16 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 12:20:33 UTC+1, tonyg wrote:
> Does any one if this is being ported to ARM or (even better) can you mix up arm and intel partitions?
Thanks for your replies. I've settled now on using Dmitrys Kazanovs components connections librarys with the GNATCOLL JSON librarys;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-16 10:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-26 11:20 ARM and gnat-glade (the distributed Annex) tonyg
2015-08-31 23:10 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-09-01 12:39 ` brbarkstrom
2015-09-16 10:41 ` tonyg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox