From: Eachus@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
Subject: Professionalism
Date: Sun, 8-Dec-85 13:54:00 EST [thread overview]
Date: Sun Dec 8 13:54:00 1985
Message-ID: <851208185443.106615@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA> (raw)
Now that the problems caused by moving Info-Ada have been fixed, I
would like to say some things in defense of Ed's efforts. The need for
professional software engineers is here. There are a lot of areas where
poor software could be much more harmful than the recent problem with
this mailing list. Responsible people are going to insist that this
work be done, and supervised, by professionals. There are four ways to
do this:
1. Use professionals from other engineering fields.
2. Impose existing standards on Software Engineers.
3. Develop new professional standards for Software Engineering.
4. Ignore the problem and hope it goes away.
For software engineers using Ada solutions one and two are
unacceptable, and in many areas (flight software, banking, SDI, etc.)
the fourth alternative is too horrible to contemplate. This leaves a
choice between developing standards ourselves, and having others impose
them. I hope that the standards that do evolve are similar to those for
other professional engineers, or those for CPA's and actuaries, where
only those who want or need to be recognized as professionals are
required to comply with the standards and ethics of the profession.
Robert I. Eachus
next reply other threads:[~1985-12-08 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1985-12-08 18:54 Eachus [this message]
1985-12-13 16:33 ` Professionalism D Gary Grady
1985-12-17 0:24 ` Professionalism Stanley Friesen
1985-12-17 10:13 ` Professionalism Dick Dunn
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox