Re: (none)

[info-ada@ucbvax.UUCP]

In article <8512040750.AA00440@ucbvax.berkeley.edu> you write:
>*<info-ada>archive.current
>\fradc-tops20
>ada
>\fhel-ace
>blyskal
>\fwisc-crys
>pb
>\fbrl-bmd
>genesis
>\fwisc-rsch
>jerome
>\fucla-cs
>amiram
>\fjpl-vlsi
>august
>larry
>jplanderson
>\fibm-sj
>alpern
>\foslo-vax
>info-ada
>\fnosc-f4
>bboard
>\fsu-sierra
>bryan
>haberler
>rosenblum
>pack
>mendal
>\fnrl-aic
>bbd-info-ada
>\fnosc
>ccvax.jackie
>elmer.jensen
>hobler
>ccvax.dukelow
>jacoby
>CCVAX.colborn
>CCVAX.tokoro
>CCVAX.hesser
>CCVAX.johnd
>sdcsvax!bill
>sdcsvax!telesoft!info-ada
>\fari-hq1
>charlie
>\fddn1
>dca-pgs
>navtelcom
>\fucla-locus
>ada-fans
>\fsri-kl
>denny
>mercado
>sarvela
>BillW
>Mathis
>\fmitre-bedford
>gte
>gah
>munck
>mcc
>Info-Ada
>bcr
>pjl
>johnm
>\fnosc-tecr
>contr22
>CONTR23
>contr04
>\fll-vlsi
>glenn
>\fdec-marlboro
>kania
>rehill
>\foffice-2
>kirk.tym
>\fsri-unix
>richard
>\flll-mfe
>info-ada%lll
>COLBORN%SAV
>\fsu-sushi
>samuel
>PACK
>\flogicon
>ada
>\fcit-vax
>engvax!info-ada
>\faids-unix
>info-ada
>\frand-relay
>info-ada.arizona
>\fbrl
>info-ada
>\fred.rutgers.edu
>info-ada-bboard
>\fdrea-xx
>info-ada
>\famsaa
>jer
>\ftl-20b
>info-ada
>\fdecwrl
>scherrer%gvaic3.dec
>seki%tkov60.dec
>\foregon-grad
>info-ada
>\fdarcom-hq
>ada
>\fdenver
>info-ada
>\fford-wdl1
>ada
>\fgunter-adam
>porter
>DSDC-SDT2
>\fhi-multics
>cornhill
>gailly.ada
>stachour
>vaughanw
>kamrad.cst
>hkberg.cscswtec
>eachus.nmlsppt
>hi-info-ada
>\flanl
>post-info-ada
>\fusc-isi
>isi-info-ada
>DRUFFEL
>GOODENOUGH
>\fanl-mcs
>dritz
>\fusc-isid
>inco
>\fnbs-vms
>kuhn
>zelkowitz
>\fmit-oz
>egk
>pao
>\fsimtel20
>rmathias
>RCONN
>\fNRL-CSS
>info-ada
>\fNYU
>INFO_ADA
>\fXEROX
>"Info-Ada^.x"
>\fbbn-clxx
>mdean
>\fRUTGERS
>MCGRATH
>\fS1-A
>JMB
>\fSU-AI
>REP
>DCL
>\fsri-csl
>bboard-info-ada
>\fBerkeley
>rhc%UCBJADE.CC
>trwrb!trwspp!hal
>trwrb!trwspp!colbert
>trwrb!trwspp!spp1!alden
>\fMaryland
>ada-bbd
>\fRADC-MULTICS
>Karlovic
>Gilyeat
>\fcornell
>infoada
>\fUSC-ECL
>LOCAL-INFO-ADA
>\fUSC-ECLB
>HFISCHER
>\fUSC-ISIE
>BERTAPELLE
>NSCHNEIDEWIND
>DKREBILL
>SAC.8AFDPI
>SAC.ADDA
>\fUSC-ISIB
>HOLG
>\fsri-spam
>trudy
>\fUSC-ISIA
>DEVCTR
>\fBBNA
>RSchaaf
>\fsri-nic
>info-ada-nic
>\fUTAH-20
>INFO-ADA
>\fWASHINGTON
>DMJ
>Sloan
>\fCISL
>Info-ADA%pco
>\fDCA-EMS
>Cleaveland
>\fwsmr01
>hhamilto
>\flll-tis-b
>info-ada-news
>\fECLB
>BSCHAAR
>eberard
>\fcmu-cs-g
>trk
>\fharvard
>info-ada-incoming
>\fseismo
>vrdxhq!info-ada
>\fucbdali
>yee
>\feglin-vax
>harbaughs
>\fSRI-AI
>GOHEEN
>\fnscw-wo
>jcavall
>\fACC
>BBOARD.ADA
>\fnprdc
>info-ada-nprdc
>\fAmes-VMSB
>welch
>\fudel
>dist-info-ada
>\fmitre-gateway
>anderson
>\fedwards-2060
>info-ada
>\fpica-lca
>kkramer
>\fnswc-wo
>cottrell
>\fisia
>mclaughlinjr
>\ftopaz
>princeton!siemens!emery
>\fcmu-cs-pt
>cmu-info-ada
>\fwpafb-afita
>rgross
>lawlis
>pnagarse
>richard
>\f
>Received: FROM USC-ECLB.ARPA BY USC-ISIF.ARPA WITH TCP ; 3 Dec 85 23:45:09 PST
>Received: from UCBVAX.BERKELEY.EDU by USC-ECLB.ARPA; Tue 3 Dec 85 23:42:20-PST
>Received: by ucbvax.berkeley.edu (5.31/1.7)
>	id AA27538; Tue, 3 Dec 85 21:22:05 PST
>Date: 3 Dec 85 10:15:41 GMT
>From: nbires!opus!rcd@ucbvax.berkeley.edu  (Dick Dunn)
>Organization: NBI,Inc, Boulder CO
>Subject: Re: Ada Professionalism Document
>Message-Id: <275@opus.UUCP>
>References: <8511291449.AA03140@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
>Sender: usenet@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
>Errors-To: <info-ada-request@usc-eclb.arpa>
>To: info-ada@usc-eclb.arpa
>
>I only follow net.lang.ada as a matter of curiousity and keeping tabs on
>what the folks here are up to.  The implications of the parent article are
>pretty appalling; I'm glad the reaction has been generally negative.  I'll
>add a few cheap shots of my own:
>> ...As chairperson of the SIGAda Issues Working Group (a working group
>> within the SIGAda Education Committee) I have been charged with creating
>> a "Strawman" document on "Professionalism for Ada Software Personnel."...
>What on earth can possibly be meant by "Ada Software Personnel"?!?!  Are we
>so specialized?  (Or is Ada so complex or so bad that you must be an Ada
>software person iff you are no other sort of software person?:-)  To me,
>"Ada Software Personnel" has the same tenor as "Sink Personnel"/"Bathtub
>Personnel"/"Toilet Personnel" distinctions when we're talking about
>plumbers.
>	If you can only program in one language, you can't program yet.
>(Whew!  There, I've said it; let the flames begin.)
>Lordy!  Ada is just another tired participant in the 25+ year progression
>of procedure-oriented/imperative/algorithmic languages.  There's no sin in
>a language being in that category, but you can only impute so much
>importance to the 327th set of miniscule refinements of an idea.  Would it
>be too much to ask for a set of criteria, if they're really needed, for
>"Professionalism for Programmers"?
>> This document must be in a form for publication by January 1986. It will
>> be discussed at the February 1986 Sigada meeting in Los Angeles. This
>> document must address management as well as technical personnel.
>But what is the problem?  It seems that someone is rushing off to create
>documents (which are the wombs in which committees are conceived) to be
>busy about some matter which has yet to be stated.
>Perhaps I am being too kind.  Perhaps there is an epidemic of
>unprofessional behavior which confines itself to Ada programmers...oops,
>excuse me, software personnel.  Maybe the Ada world has problems that the
>rest of us don't?  (If it does, I would guess it to be the overambitious
>exploration of non-issues:-)
>But what are the issues of concern to these Ada software personnel?
>> 1. A Professional License Exam
>By all means...and let's start licensing mechanics--separate licenses for
>each of socket, hammer, impact wrench, screwdrivers (with optional
>specialization in Phillips, flat, and for the experts, Torx).
>> 2. Responsibility
>> 3. Code of Ethics
>> 4. Accountability
>These sound like good things to be considered as Ada-specific!  (Actually,
>I could be serious here--to the extent that the Ada community is visibly
>more tempted by the prospect of gouging the US government out of big $$$
>than any other language-oriented community...but that is not an aspect
>that's likely to be of interest to the paper-generators.)
>> 6. Job Titles/Categories
>What do the rest of you think?  Is it different than the rest of the
>industry?
>> 11. Internship
>FOR A SINGLE SILLY LANGUAGE?!?!?!
>> 12. Continuing Education
>ditto
>> 16. Professional Model
>> 17. Peer Review
>> 18. Censure and Appeal
>> 19. Best Programming Practice
>Don't you know how to deal with these matters?  Do it one-on-one; work with
>people.  There's nothing you can cast into rules and procedures that can't
>be done better and faster by clear-thinking individuals acting on their own
>judgment.
>> 20. Transition Strategy
>From what to what?  (I have the feeling that there are still people who
>think that Ada is the single language of the future and that all we have to
>do is convert to it.  If there are, I'd like to know (1) what they're
>smoking and (2) where I can get some--a small quantity only.:-)
>> 21. Major Professional Society
>...some of which have heartily rejected Ada (in response to the way the
>perpetrators of Ada have rejected them).  If the kids won't let you play,
>you can buy your own football, huh?
>> 22. Regulatory Board
>ooooof.  bureaucracy.  No more to say.
>-- 
>Dick Dunn	{hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd		(303)444-5710 x3086
>   ...Reality?  Gad, that's worse than puberty!


	Please cease this clutter !
						Larry Johnson
						ihnp4!cuae2!laj