From: Mailer@USC-ECLB.ARPA (The Mailer Daemon)
Subject: Message of 13-Oct-85 15:46:57
Date: Mon, 14-Oct-85 02:33:57 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Mon Oct 14 02:33:57 1985
Message-ID: <8510140653.AA05217@UCB-VAX> (raw)
Message failed for the following:
STAGER@EGLIN-VAX.ARPA.#Internet: 550 User "STAGER" Unknown.
harbaughs@EGLIN-VAX.ARPA.#Internet: 550 User "harbaughs" Unknown.
------------
Return-Path: <@rand-unix:ttidca!csun!csuna!csunb!bfcscadj@rand-unix>
Received: from UCB-VAX.ARPA by USC-ECLB.ARPA; Thu 3 Oct 85 02:38:45-PDT
Received: by UCB-VAX.ARPA (5.28/5.11)
id AA09205; Thu, 3 Oct 85 02:38:27 PDT
Return-Path: <ttidca!csun!csuna!csunb!bfcscadj@rand-unix.ARPA>
Received: from ttidca.UUCP by rand-unix.ARPA; Thu, 3 Oct 85 02:40:51 pdt
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 85 02:40:51 pdt
From: ttidca!csun!csuna!csunb!bfcscadj@rand-unix.arpa
Message-Id: <8510030940.AA10656@rand-unix.ARPA>
Apparently-To: info-ada@berkeley.arpa
ReSent-Date: Sun 13 Oct 85 15:46:57-PDT
ReSent-From: INFO-ADA@USC-ECLB.ARPA
ReSent-To: info-ada@USC-ECLB.ARPA
ReSent-Message-ID: <12150885389.35.INFO-ADA@USC-ECLB.ARPA>
For the IBM-PC, an ADA compiler was purchased called JANUS/ADA. Since it is
using the name "ADA", does it not mean that it is validated? This compiler
was missing many of the special ADA features (tasking, packaging). If this
is not legal (DOD copyright), then why hasn't anyone clamped down on these
less-than-ADA ADA compilers? BTW, the JANUS/ADA cost ~$999 and they are
selling another "ADA compiler" for ~$99.
-------
reply other threads:[~1985-10-14 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox