From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Representation clauses and streams
Date: 1999/12/29
Date: 1999-12-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84du8g$c67$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: tgso0lg67p.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
In article <tgso0lg67p.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>,
Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@rus.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote:
> Well, I don't like this behavior at all.
Then you should submit a comment, this is the required behavior
as specified in the RM.
> Is there any reason why GNAT
> ignores the implementation advice 13.13.2(17)?
GNAT is NOT ignoring this advice
> What are other compilers doing here?
At least one other compiler gets this wrong. We have been
discussing in the ARG whether to modify the RM rules in this
area to give something more to your liking :-)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-29 0:00 Representation clauses and streams Florian Weimer
1999-12-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-12-30 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-01-02 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-01-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-01-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-04 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-01-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-29 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-29 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox