From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 )
Subject: Re: Programming vs. Software Engineering
Date: 24 Mar 90 17:03:19 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8481@hubcap.clemson.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4561@pegasus.ATT.COM
From psrc@pegasus.ATT.COM (Paul S. R. Chisholm):
> Most software engineering (requirements analysis, design of data
> structures and functions, various kinds of testing, configuration
> management, etc.) is completely language independent. I'm glad
> STANFINS-R was able to take people with bad habits and instill
> good habits in them; but nothing Mr. Wolfe has posted in this
> article says anything good about the Ada programming language.
OK, let me be more explicit. The Ada programming language
was explicitly designed to provide maximal support for the
software and particularly code engineering process, and it
has clearly been extremely successful at doing so.
Satisfied?
Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-03-24 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <19450@grebyn.com>
1990-03-10 20:35 ` Ted Holden's disinformation William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1990-03-12 15:58 ` Wayne Wood
1990-03-12 19:36 ` dennis.f.meyer
1990-03-21 23:27 ` Lyle Seaman
1990-03-22 17:02 ` Programming vs. Software Engineering William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1990-03-23 16:45 ` Chip Salzenberg
1990-03-24 6:32 ` Paul S. R. Chisholm
1990-03-24 17:03 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 [this message]
1990-03-26 20:30 ` Archer Sully
1990-03-27 15:54 ` Richard S D'Ippolito
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox