From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Tips for conversion from Apex to GNAT
Date: 1999/12/26
Date: 1999-12-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <845nna$pdu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: s6ccap5h45153@corp.supernews.com
In article <s6ccap5h45153@corp.supernews.com>,
"Arthur Schwarz" <aschwarz@acm.org> wrote:
> The major problem that I
> recall was the placement of one of the pragma's. RATIONAL
places it between
> the package start and the end package, GNAT places it after
> the end package.
Certainly if this was the "major problem", then you had highly
portable code. In our experience the major impediment to porting
between *any* two Ada compilers is legitimate implementation
dependencies.
However the pragma placement cannot be an ID, and must represent
a bug in one or the other compiler, so you might want to give
more details on this.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-22 0:00 Tips for conversion from Apex to GNAT Chris Powell
1999-12-23 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1999-12-26 0:00 ` Arthur Schwarz
1999-12-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-01-12 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox