From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Type casting question
Date: 1999/12/24
Date: 1999-12-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83usga$ie1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1999Dec23.140120.1@eisner
In article <1999Dec23.140120.1@eisner>,
Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam wrote:
> You will notice a difference, however, in the degree to which
the Ada 95
> experts are able to relate to those who are not in their
position. Some
> of them are much more easygoing, for example Tucker Taft.
Certainly we are happy to answer Ada 83 questions when we know
that someone is limited to Ada 83, and from time to time we
do get questions of that kind :-) But the future of Ada depends
on Ada 95 (I don't think anyone sees much *future* in Ada 83,
though of course it is serving well in legacy programs [just
like Larry's pile of Vaxes :-)]
Robert Dewar
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-20 0:00 Type casting question Raju Vemulamanda
1999-12-20 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-12-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-22 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-23 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-23 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox