From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Type casting question
Date: 1999/12/23
Date: 1999-12-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83sbku$rda$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 83p0mc$g7g$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <83p0mc$g7g$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
reason67@my-deja.com wrote:
> I think it is far safer to determine which version of the
language they
> are using from context. When people use Ada 83 syntax, I
assume they are
> using Ada 83 unless they state otherwise.
> ---
> Jeffrey S. Blatt
That's a bit bizarre, there is no such thing as using Ada 83
syntax in this context, since all Ada 83 syntax is included
in Ada 95. I really have NO idea what you are talking about!
The notion that Ada means Ada 95 is not an invention of the
list, it is the formal position of ISO. Once a new standard
comes out, the name refers ONLY to the current standard!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-20 0:00 Type casting question Raju Vemulamanda
1999-12-20 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-12-21 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-12-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-22 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-12-23 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-23 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox