RE: Help me to chose between ADA 95 and C++

[Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>]

In article <NBBBJNOMKDIAJALCEFIJOELFDGAA.rleif@rleif.com>,
	"Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <rleif@rleif.com> wrote:

>From: Bob Leif
>To: Richard Riehle et al.
>How do you set an instantiation equal to a universal integer or
>universal_real? I tried to do this with a 32 bit data type and had to
define
>a non_private type for simple operations like
>Data_32 : Data_32_Type := 7;
>I then converted from the non_private to the private (Ugly).

Robert,

A universal integer is not a defined type.  You would want to 
declare a type to accomplish instantiation using my generic 
example.  It cannot be instantiated with a universal integer
or a universal float since it is a private type formal parameter.

I am not sure whether I actually answered your question.  Perhaps
someone else will have a different reading of it.

Regards,

Richard

-- =========== Code from my earlier post follows =================  

>generic
>   type Number is private;
>   with function "+" (L, R : Number) return Number is <>;
>   -- all other operators similarly declared as generic parameters
>package Generic_Operators is end Generic_Operators;
>
>with Generic_Operators;
>generic
>  with package Operators is new Generic_Operators (<>);
>package Statistics is
>   ...
>end Statistics;
>
>which allows instantiation with any numeric type.  Also, there is a
>way to instantiate this with a non-numeric type that I published in
>an Ada Letters a couple of years ago.
>
>So, on this point, Chris, I am pretty much in agreement with you.
>
>Richard Riehle
>
>      P.S.  I apologize if my earlier reply was a bit to harsh.
>
>
>
>
>
>