From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 )
Subject: How do you do this in Ada?
Date: 13 Mar 90 17:57:33 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8364@hubcap.clemson.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1990Mar13.162411.15058@planck.uucp
(Another article from comp.software-eng which should have gone
to comp.lang.ada originally...)
From westley@corsair.uucp (Terry J. Westley):
We are building a real-time radar simulation on a distributed network of
~35 Sun workstations and ~35 68030 CPU boards (Motorola MVME147
specifically). Parts of the network will be Ethernet; the backbone will
be FDDI. Now, for my question:
I have approximately 200 unique messages that are transmitted over the
net among all the various nodes. How do I send a particular Ada object
of some arbitrary record type to another node while:
1) preserving strong typing -- I don't want to have to convert
everything to some common structure such as an array of bytes
2) reducing messages to the smallest possible size -- I need to reduce
the net traffic as much as possible -- as you know, there are numerous
challenges relating to using variant record structures while trying
to achieve this goal
3) avoiding giving global visibility to all message types to all program
units
I started out by writing a LAN interface package as a generic patterned
after sequential_io. You instantiate it with the particular variant
record structure that applies to the sender and receiver of that
particular data. I also imported a function to determine the size of
a particular record so that I wouldn't always be sending the maximum
size of the record.
The major problem with this is that I have many different combinations
of messages to be sent to each destination. Here is a much simplified
example of this problem. Suppose I have three elements that need to
communicate:
Element # Runs on Processor Needs message types
--------- ---------------- -------------------
1 A a, b, c
2 B b, c
3 C a, c
I could build a variant record structure of message types a, b, and c.
However, then Element 2 and 3 have visibility to message types they have
no business seeing. I can't build three variant records (a-b-c, b-c,
and a-c) because the record types will now be incompatible.
Any ideas?
Terry J. Westley
Arvin/Calspan Advanced Technology Center
P.O. Box 400, Buffalo, NY 14225
acsu.buffalo.edu!planck!westley@hercules
parent reply other threads:[~1990-03-13 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <1990Mar13.162411.15058@planck.uucp>]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox