From: Jesper Quorning <jquorning@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT proposal: note on implicit exceptions insertion
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 08:15:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2019-02-16T08:15:50-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <833c7ccd-8c20-42d1-9359-486d3fd7e3f2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6225c504-8085-4753-bedd-0b1e5816d2a0@googlegroups.com>
On Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 5:30:16 AM UTC+1, Brad Moore wrote:
> One option would be to write the code you want checked in SPARK.
I am not against exceptions as such. A note would be an easy way to inspect the quality for my writings. And easy to implement for the compiler writer (as far as I can see).
Jesper.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-16 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-10 2:03 GNAT proposal: note on implicit exceptions insertion Jesper Quorning
2019-02-10 18:08 ` Simon Wright
2019-02-11 21:36 ` Jesper Quorning
2019-02-11 22:31 ` Anh Vo
2019-02-11 23:41 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-02-12 7:05 ` Jesper Quorning
2019-02-12 23:08 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-02-16 4:30 ` Brad Moore
2019-02-16 16:15 ` Jesper Quorning [this message]
2019-02-12 8:19 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-02-12 8:35 ` Jesper Quorning
2019-02-12 9:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-02-12 12:46 ` Jesper Quorning
2019-02-12 7:28 ` Mark Lorenzen
2019-02-12 8:34 ` Jesper Quorning
2019-02-12 22:31 ` Fedja Beader
2019-02-13 10:42 ` Simon Wright
2019-02-11 6:53 ` Mark Lorenzen
2019-02-11 8:13 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox