From: Ed Falis <falis@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Unsigned Longword
Date: 1999/12/11
Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82sd1e$soq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: OF8A70EE05.EDBCEFED-ON88256843.0079C931@ray.ca
In article <OF8A70EE05.EDBCEFED-ON88256843.0079C931@ray.ca>,
comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org wrote:
.
>
> I'd like to ask this forum if there was/is a nicer way of implementing a 'true'
> Unsigned Longword?
Well, these days most compilers will support type Interfaces.Unsigned_32.
Now the issue (for some) is Unsigned_64 ;-)
- Ed
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-10 0:00 Unsigned Longword Tom_Hargraves
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Ed Falis [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox