From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Subject: Re: Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java?
Date: 1999/12/11
Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82s5qs$ocb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 82638m$cif$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <82638m$cif$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> Averstar and ACT are newer, but that really just means that
> their main corporate focus is still on their compilers.
A peculiar statement :-)
Averstar (Intermetrics) was the runner up in the competition
to define Ada (see the many interesting ideas in the Red
language). They were a major player in both the Ada market and
in the validation effort early on. I will leave it to the
Averstar people to comment on the claim that their main
corporate focus is still on their compilers (that seems quite
wrong to me).
Ada Core Technologies, although new as a company, is hardly new
to the Ada game.
A central core of the company has been working on Ada since
the early 80's (several of the people working for Ada Core
Tecnologies were involved in the 1983 first Ada validation,
and we have validation certificate number 001 hanging on the
wall).
Anyway, the issue is not so much whether a company is focussed
on compilers, but rather whether they are focussed on Ada. At
Ada Core Technologies, our attention is focussed more and more
on tools, rather than the compiler itself, but still very much
focussed on Ada.
Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-26 0:00 Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java? jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` mike_zebrowski
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-30 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-03 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-12-03 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Mark Hertel
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-02 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-12-01 0:00 ` David W. Glessner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-11-26 0:00 Tom_Hargraves
[not found] ` <01bf3857$22ca59a0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Ed Falis
[not found] ` <01bf38cc$04d205e0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-27 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-12-12 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Henrik Delin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox