From: Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Business Week (12/6/99 issue) article on Software Quality
Date: 1999/12/09
Date: 1999-12-09T22:27:33+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82pacl$k26$1@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 82p4de$ima$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <82p4de$ima$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
>In article <82mle2$3v3$1@nntp8.atl.mindspring.net>,
> Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> Please craft your own response to the Business Week article if you
>
>I'm not entirely sure it merited one. I agree that they missed a rather
>rich problem source in the obstinate use of error-prone languages. But
>at least they didn't *blame* Ada for problems. That's a good start. :-)
In fact, Ted, I did not intend to write a response. Then I was
contacted by some people in the Ada community who suggested I
write one. You are certainly correct that not blaming Ada was
a good start.
Once I decided to honor the request to write a response, I thought
carefully about my audience. I realized that most of the readers
are not software practitioners, but also that most of them have the
opportunity to influence software decisions and raise good questions.
In that spirit, I crafted each sentence quite carefully, made each
one intentionally provocative, and inserted the mention of Ada as
almost a "by the way." Perhaps I could have done this better had I
taken more time. Perhaps it would be more acceptable to the software
practitioners on this forum if I had first submitted it for approval.
It is as it is. I cannot apologize for any part of it since no part of
it, except the typo "disclaminer" was an accident. The entire piece, or
some part of it may have been a mistake (not a bug), but that is another
issue.
>Being a cynic, I suspect that editors often select the letters that are
>the *least* sensible-sounding, or have bizzare or easily refutable
>points. Given that viewpoint, more letters would be a *bad* thing, as
>some are bound to be worse. :-)
A cynic? Bow wow! I never would have guessed that. :-) Seriously,
Ted, your objections to my viewpoint are always welcome. I really do
understand that my assertions are sometimes a bit over the top, but
extremism in the defence of extremism is no vice. As to what editors
select, I find they select letters based on some little phrase they
find entertaining rather than what they find sensible. I tried to
make the response entertaining, but who knows if they will find it so.
Thanks for a lively conversation,
Best regards from cla's resident shrill and crackpot, :-)
Richard Riehle
P.S. Some of my colleagues in Silicon Valley consider me
a shrill and crackpot for espousing Ada. Sigh.....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-01 0:00 Business Week (12/6/99 issue) article on Software Quality Michael P. Card
1999-12-01 0:00 ` ld
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Michael P. Card
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Michael P. Card
1999-12-07 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Greg Martin
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Ray Blaak
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Jerry Maple
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-14 0:00 ` P.S> Norby
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Jeffrey L Straszheim
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-08 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-09 0:00 ` John English
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-08 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Georg Bauhaus
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle [this message]
1999-12-02 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-12-12 0:00 ` Ronald Caudill
1999-12-13 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-12-13 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-12-13 0:00 ` John Duncan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox