From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Possible for Ada 2020: "Cursors" for Arrays
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-06-04T07:18:04-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81fc9059-d18b-49ad-8375-d436587f19bf@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b15f6kFrfs6U1@mid.individual.net>
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 12:19:00 AM UTC-6, Niklas Holsti wrote:
>
> I think it would be better to build this ability from syntax similar to
> the quantified expressions - "for all/some I in <range> => ...". To
> avoid ambiguities when the array elements are Boolean we should use a
> new keyword instead of "all" or "some".
Why would it matter syntax-wise? (that is, I don't see how there would be a problem when the elements are a boolean-type for the attribute form... that seems to only arise in a situation like you are proposing, jumping off "for all"/"for some" syntactic constructs.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-04 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-04 1:09 Possible for Ada 2020: "Cursors" for Arrays Shark8
2013-06-04 6:19 ` Niklas Holsti
2013-06-04 14:18 ` Shark8 [this message]
2013-06-04 19:27 ` Niklas Holsti
2013-06-04 20:47 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-06-06 8:58 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox