From: holden@cca.UUCP (Russ Holden)
Subject: Re: ForTran-Ada + flamette + question
Date: Tue, 3-Jun-86 08:39:27 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Tue Jun 3 08:39:27 1986
Message-ID: <8197@cca.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 230@sdcjove.UUCP
> In article <503@noscvax.UUCP> broman@noscvax.UUCP (Vincent P. Broman) writes:
> >A generic quadrature package mispleases because separate copies of
> >it must be instantiated for each function to be integrated.
>
> Please DON'T confuse Ada with its current implementations. There is
> no reason that the bodies of a generic quadrature package cannot be
> shared. Just because current implementations don't do it (YET!!!),
> don't damn Ada.
>
Right, don't damn Ada for silly things when there are so many real
reasons to do so!
--
Russell Holden
Computer Corporation of America
Four Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1986-06-03 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1986-05-28 16:56 ForTran-Ada + flamette + question richw
1986-05-30 16:28 ` Vincent P. Broman
1986-06-02 16:28 ` Jonathan P. Biggar
1986-06-03 5:11 ` Barry Margolin
1986-06-03 12:39 ` Russ Holden [this message]
1986-06-04 23:39 ` Bryce Bardin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1986-05-28 15:54 richw
1986-05-30 12:46 ` Russ Holden
[not found] <175155@QZCOM>
1986-05-22 1:00 ` Jan_Michael_Rynning
1986-05-21 6:06 larry
1986-05-21 15:41 ` Mark Biggar
1986-05-21 16:40 ` broman
1986-05-28 19:30 ` David Lamb
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox