From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: setting an address with pure?
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-07-14T02:36:03-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <817ea2df-90b6-4f36-ad55-115e9dc126df@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mo12eh$als$1@loke.gir.dk>
On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 9:10:10 PM UTC+2, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> It certainly seems wrong that an address clause for a hardware entity can't
> be used in a preelaborated unit.
I have been bitten by this restriction several times and it's a real pain.
> I'd encourage you to post this problem on Ada-Comment, so that it gets on
> the ARG agenda. (If we end up with a static function aspect, it would make
> sense to apply it to To_Address.)
Yes please - the current restriction prevents many low-level I/O packages from having preelaborable elaboration, which transitively prevents a whole I/O library from having preelaborable elaboration.
Regards,
MarkL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 11:48 Q: setting an address with pure? Simon Wright
2015-07-10 12:03 ` G.B.
2015-07-10 14:38 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-10 22:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-07-11 7:47 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-13 19:10 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-07-14 9:36 ` Mark Lorenzen [this message]
2015-07-13 23:41 ` RasikaSrinivasan
2015-07-14 7:38 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-14 7:42 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-11 10:35 ` Q: " Brian Drummond
2015-07-11 13:30 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-11 14:03 ` AdaMagica
2015-07-11 14:27 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-13 18:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-07-13 19:50 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-14 12:24 ` Brian Drummond
2015-07-15 15:50 ` rrr.eee.27
2015-07-15 18:45 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-16 9:21 ` Brian Drummond
2015-07-16 18:54 ` Simon Wright
2015-07-16 19:14 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox