From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Bugs or Mistakes?
Date: 1999/11/19
Date: 1999-11-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <812p3s$2ei$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3832E75B.2B6E7E1E@pwfl.com
In article <3832E75B.2B6E7E1E@pwfl.com>,
condicma@pwflcom wrote:
> Perhaps "design defects" is a more accurate description of
> what we commonly call "bugs"
I don't like lumping all bugs into design flaws. To me a design
flaw is quite a different beast from a typo introduced during
implementation, and it is useful in preventing, finding,
tracking, ande removing bugs to make the distinction.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-12 0:00 Bugs or Mistakes? MaryAnn Atkinson
1999-11-13 0:00 ` M.
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-15 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-11-15 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-11-15 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Marin Condic
1999-11-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-11-20 0:00 ` Michael Stark
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox