From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Confusing language, was Re: Help help.. please.i am totaly n
Date: 1999/11/19
Date: 1999-11-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <812ln3$53$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3832EA6D.598C8B1F@pwfl.com
In article <3832EA6D.598C8B1F@pwfl.com>,
condicma@pwflcom wrote:
> Why not a
> minimal acceptable standard for dates? Maybe Ada can be the
> first to define such a standard?
What's wrong with the ISO standard date format???
Why should we generate yet another standard when this one
exists?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-13 0:00 Confusing language, was Re: Help help.. please.i am totaly n Wilhelm Spickermann
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-13 0:00 ` Fraser
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Marin Condic
1999-11-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
[not found] ` <01bf2e86$10250460$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-18 0:00 ` Lionel Draghi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-11-16 0:00 Wilhelm Spickermann
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox