From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Rep-spec question
Date: 1999/11/11
Date: 1999-11-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80djt4$4jt$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 80cqb7$if9$1@nnrp1.deja.com
In article <80cqb7$if9$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
> At the risk of opening the "implementation advice" can of
> worms again,
> the size clause above is not required to be accepted by an
> implementation. But if your vendor follows the recomendation
in the
> implementaion advice (which most should), then it will
compile. The
> implementation advice in question (from 13.3) is:
Ted, please get this right in future :-) We just got through
discussing this. Implementation advice in chapter 13 becomes
*REQUIREMENTS* if the systems programming annex is implemented.
Since any serious compiler implements this annex, this is in
fact a requirement!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-10 0:00 Rep-spec question Joe Wisniewski
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Joe Wisniewski
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-11 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-11-12 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-12 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-11-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-11-11 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox