From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada
Date: 1999/11/09
Date: 1999-11-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8086j7$54e$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3826FD9C.37446C29@callnetuk.com
In article <3826FD9C.37446C29@callnetuk.com>,
Nick Roberts <nickroberts@callnetuk.com> wrote:
> type Bit_Integer is mod 2;
> type Bit_Array is array (Natural range <>) of Bit_Integer;
I don't see the introduction of these types in the RM as being
a helpful step in improving portability. Can you give an example
of something that *in practice* is a portability problem now,
that would be no longer a problem. I am not really interested
in problems that might happen in theory, but do not happen in
practice.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-04 0:00 Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada John Halleck
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-08 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Advice, or *Advice*? (was: Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada) Ted Dennison
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada Robert Dewar
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-11-05 0:00 ` John Halleck
1999-11-08 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox