From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada
Date: 1999/11/05
Date: 1999-11-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vurt3$ojd$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7vt67r$qv0$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu
In article <7vt67r$qv0$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu>,
nahaj@u.cc.utah.edu (John Halleck) wrote:
> Is there even a portable way to get the "raw" bits for a
> file that works on all machines supporting Ada? (So that it
> can be handed to a bit oriented version of SHA.)
Sure, have a look at Ada.Streams.Stream_IO
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-04 0:00 Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada John Halleck
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-11-05 0:00 ` John Halleck
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-11-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-08 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-11-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Advice, or *Advice*? (was: Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada) Ted Dennison
1999-11-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Binary files vs Portablity vs Ada Robert Dewar
1999-11-08 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-09 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox