From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC compatability.
Date: 1999/09/30
Date: 1999-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7supva$9t6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7vr9jii9jm.fsf@pogner.moho
In article <x7vr9jii9jm.fsf@pogner.moho>,
Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> The (admittedly minimal) C++ code I've built
> with such a beast has
> given me no problems.
>
> Just one (rather vague) datum, of course!
No one said that it would be completely inoperative. The errors
which are undoubtedly there are likely to be quite subtle. The
point is that our patches have not been tested on G++, and in
any case there are known weaknesses in 2.8.1 (unpatched) wrt g++
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-30 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-28 0:00 GNAT and GCC compatability Larry Stanbery
1999-09-28 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-09-28 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-09-29 0:00 ` Larry Stanbery
1999-09-29 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-09-29 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-09-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox