From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Engineering types hierarchy
Date: 1999/09/09
Date: 1999-09-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7r8caf$b4o$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7r7dje$sdi5@svlss.lmms.lmco.com
In article <7r7dje$sdi5@svlss.lmms.lmco.com>,
dkristol@see-my.sig wrote:
> Perhaps i did not choose my key words well. :-(
Perhaps not all literature is on the web, and libraries are
still useful?? :-)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-08 0:00 Engineering types hierarchy David Kristola
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-09-10 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-09-10 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-09-09 0:00 Matthew Heaney
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-09-10 0:00 ` David Kristola
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox