From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Sequential_IO
Date: 1999/08/19
Date: 1999-08-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7phfpm$78r$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37BC277E.B17EEEFF@averstar.com
In article <37BC277E.B17EEEFF@averstar.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> one for each drive letter (everyone who thinks drive letters are the
> dumbest O/S idea of all time raise their hand ;-). On VMS systems,
Not here. My vote goes for DOS's upper memory/lower memory/extended
memory foolishness.
And in fairness to DOS, Unix's case-sensitive file names comes in at
about #5 on the list.
--
T.E.D.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-08-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-08-18 0:00 Sequential_IO Shawn Barber
1999-08-18 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Larry Kilgallen
1999-08-18 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Ted Dennison
1999-08-18 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Marin David Condic
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Tucker Taft
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Robert Dewar
1999-08-21 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Simon Wright
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Marin David Condic
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Shawn Barber
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Ted Dennison
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO Marin David Condic
1999-08-19 0:00 ` Sequential_IO David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox