From: "John Duncan" <jddst19+@pitt.edu>
Subject: Re: What is differance between thick and thin binding?
Date: 1999/08/09
Date: 1999-08-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7oo2d2$gjm$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 934219556.19836@www.remarq.com
Simply put, a thin binding feels like the other language, and a thick
binding feels like Ada. For example, the win32ada package (or the adawin
package) provides a thin binding and everything looks translated from C.
The CLAW package and the Windex package are thick bindings. There, the
structure of the win32 SDK is not as obvious from the packages, rather they
are organized as an Ada-like front-end to the code written in "C".
-John
Ronald Caudill <anonymous@web.remarq.com> wrote in message
news:934219556.19836@www.remarq.com...
> Hi:
> I see the terms "Thick binding" and "Thin binding"
> referring to making other technologies usable with Ada.
> What is the differance between these two?
>
>
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network
*
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-08-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <934219556.19836@www.remarq.com>
1999-08-09 0:00 ` What is differance between thick and thin binding? tmoran
1999-08-09 0:00 ` John Duncan [this message]
1999-08-10 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-08-10 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1999-08-10 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-08-11 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-08-10 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-08-12 0:00 ` David Emery
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox