From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Access to procedures
Date: 1999/06/27
Date: 1999-06-27T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7l5vpm$mfq@lotho.delphi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.BSF.4.10.9906270946040.19516-100000@shell5.ba.best.com
>> When working on my GUI classes, I have been a VERY happy camper to have
>> Unrestricted_Access around for quick testing and even for small little apps
>> that use the classes.
>
>If it makes you a happy camper, how can it be bad?
If it feels good at the time, it must be good?
How about "Use Unrestricted_Access when appropriate, but don't
make a habit of it". There are almost always better ways to solve
the problem. Practice learning and using them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-06-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-06-25 0:00 Access to procedures Gautier
1999-06-25 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-06-25 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-06-25 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-06-25 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-06-26 0:00 ` Gautier
1999-06-26 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-06-27 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-06-27 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-06-27 0:00 ` tmoran [this message]
1999-06-28 0:00 ` Gautier
1999-06-26 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-06-25 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-06-26 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox