From: "David Botton" <David@Botton.com>
Subject: Re: Access to procedures
Date: 1999/06/27
Date: 1999-06-27T04:49:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7l4agm$hn0$1@news.gate.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7l34od$3b0@lotho.delphi.com
I don't believe he was looking to use it as part of his code, but rather as
an option for test drivers or those that wish to use his packages.
Any serious code is going to include library level functions, etc that would
eliminate a need for Unrestricted_Access.
When working on my GUI classes, I have been a VERY happy camper to have
Unrestricted_Access around for quick testing and even for small little apps
that use the classes.
David Botton
tmoran@bix.com wrote in message <7l34od$3b0@lotho.delphi.com>...
>IMHO, if you use "unrestricted_access", you are
>living dangerously and creating a potential trap for future,
>less careful, users of your Extract package. Not to mention it
>becomes non-standard Ada, tied to one particular compiler.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-06-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-06-25 0:00 Access to procedures Gautier
1999-06-25 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-06-25 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-06-25 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-06-25 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-06-26 0:00 ` Gautier
1999-06-26 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-06-26 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-06-27 0:00 ` David Botton [this message]
1999-06-27 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-06-27 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-06-28 0:00 ` Gautier
1999-06-25 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-06-26 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox