From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Private Children
Date: 1999/06/21
Date: 1999-06-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7klja3$c0p$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3bteacxb8.fsf@mheaney.ni.net
In article <m3bteacxb8.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>,
Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> Can a public child package with its private sibling?
>
Almost exactly one month ago, I posted the exact same question.
Go to deja.com and search for a thread titled "Children of private
compilation units" to see the discussion.
As I remember, it went something like this: Gnat doesn't accept it, and
Robert Dewar says its not legal Ada. ObjectAda and GreenHills do accept
it, and Tucker Taft says it *is* legal Ada. I offered to send in a bug
report to the appropriate vendor, if a consensus could be reached on
which one was in error. Currenly there appears to be no such consensus.
--
T.E.D.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-06-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-06-20 0:00 Private Children Matthew Heaney
1999-06-21 0:00 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
1999-06-21 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-06-21 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-06-21 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-06-22 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-06-22 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-06-22 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-06-22 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-06-23 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-06-23 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-06-23 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-06-23 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-06-23 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-06-23 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-06-24 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
1999-06-24 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-06-23 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-06-24 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-06-21 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-06-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-06-21 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox