From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: gdb fails unders win95?
Date: 1999/05/26
Date: 1999-05-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7igshj$nhs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 374B5779.A93E4855@Botton.com
In article <374B5779.A93E4855@Botton.com>,
David Botton <David@Botton.com> wrote:
> Why not?
>
> Stephen Leake wrote:
> > gdb has not yet been taught how to understand Microsoft
debugging
> > format, and probably never will.
Because, last I knew, this was a proprietary format whose
details are not published by Microsoft. Yes, it might be
possible to reverse engineer this, but after the Stacker
decision, you pause before relying on RE!
If this is wrong, and MS has indeed published the format, there
is no reason why it should not be supported, but of course it
needs someone to do the work!
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-22 0:00 gdb fails unders win95? fdebruin
1999-05-22 0:00 ` James S. Rogers
1999-05-25 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1999-05-25 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-05-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-05-27 0:00 ` fdebruin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox