From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: Sun Ada 3.0 / 2.1.1
Date: 1999/05/24
Date: 1999-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ic9j2$eq3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3748CEEB.9815A4F5@gateway.net
In article <3748CEEB.9815A4F5@gateway.net>,
fea <fea@gateway.net> wrote:
> While the correct solution is to isolate the dependency with a
> user defined type
This is of course an Ada 83 style comment.
For Ada 95, there is no dependency in properly written code,
since you simply use the proper types from Interfaces.C to
match the float types in your C code, and you are guaranteed
portability, no matter what the definitions of the standard
types in the Ada compiler or the C compiler are.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-17 0:00 Sun Ada 3.0 / 2.1.1 Guy Calinsky
1999-05-18 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-05-24 0:00 ` fea
1999-05-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-05-22 0:00 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox