From: Charlie McCutcheon <"cmccutcheon@NOSPAMbegin"@enet.dec.com>
Subject: Re: A question for my personal knowledge.
Date: 1999/05/17
Date: 1999-05-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hp5qk$at@zk2nws.zko.dec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 373992FC.86F994D6@pwfl.com
I think "interesting we don't do that here" generally translates to "we're not
interested in training you - NEXT". If you don't have the specific language
skills they want, you're not considered for the job. That's a negative if you
wanted the job. So if Ada is not wanted with employers, Ada programmers worry
about being employable.
That said, I certainly think that any decent programmer can and should be able to
learn new languages... ;-)
Charlie
Marin David Condic wrote:
> Roger Racine wrote:
> > We recently had a former employee come back for a job interview. He
> > specifically said that he would not come back to an Ada job. There are many
> > who think it is a blot on their resume to have their current job something
> > that is "not marketable", like Ada. These are (otherwise) very intelligent
> > people.
> >
> Having been on either side of the job interview, I cannot possibly
> imagine how someone looking for a hard working, intelligent, self
> starting, go-getter to work on their project would view experience with
> some specific computer language as a *negative*. I could imagine someone
> saying "interesting, but we don't do that here", but it is difficult to
> imagine someone saying "Oh, you worked with language X so it must have
> dammaged your brain and made you worthless to do 'real' work!"
....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-10 0:00 A question for my personal knowledge Siamak Kaveh
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Roy Grimm
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Roy Grimm
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Roy Grimm
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Roy Grimm
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon [this message]
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Chris
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-18 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-05-18 0:00 ` William B. Clodius
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Roy Grimm
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-05-11 0:00 ` dennison
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Mike Yoder
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Mike
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Martin C. Carlisle
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Mike
1999-05-13 0:00 ` David Starner
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Georg Bauhaus
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Steve
1999-05-15 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-05-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-05-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
1999-05-19 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Dan Nagle
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon
1999-05-12 0:00 ` Werner Pachler
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon
1999-05-17 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-05-18 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-05-19 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-05-10 0:00 ` Sam
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-05-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox