From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: Is system part of standard?
Date: 1999/04/30
Date: 1999-04-30T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7gclq1$mf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3729AA8A.261C142A@averstar.com
In article <3729AA8A.261C142A@averstar.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> The advice is false. However, perhaps what they
> should have said is that *after* you "with" System,
> you may still need to refer to it via "Standard.System"
> if the name "System" by itself is hidden by something
> declared inside the current compilation unit.
That won't help much if Standard is hidden :-)
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-30 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <37295ff2.2075172@news.geccs.gecm.com>
1999-04-30 0:00 ` Is system part of standard? Tucker Taft
1999-04-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
[not found] ` <372a74e6.7440315@news.geccs.gecm.com>
1999-04-30 0:00 ` Jerry Petrey
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox