From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: static objects in ADA
Date: 1999/04/26
Date: 1999-04-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7g26c7$n3v$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7g1uvn$fjr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <7g1uvn$fjr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
dennison@telepath.com wrote:
> Compiler developers are notoriously anti-OO. Perhaps that
> is because of all the extra work those OO features cause
> them. :-)
What a completely bizarre (and completely unsupportable)
claim. Perhaps you have had the bad fortune to run into
one or more particular developers with this incompetent
attitude, but to generalize it to all developers is
unreasonable.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-21 0:00 static objects in ADA Mark Elson
1999-04-21 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-04-21 0:00 ` dennison
1999-04-21 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1999-04-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-04-25 0:00 ` Mark Elson
1999-04-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-26 0:00 ` dennison
1999-04-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-05-07 0:00 ` Mark Elson
1999-05-07 0:00 ` dennison
1999-04-25 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox