From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "shadow" package hierarchy using renaming of child packages
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-06-30T18:34:17-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f402618-da9e-4c01-85b8-5742a7b89b31@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22fdedd9-f5e2-4489-bd41-7fb3b21e9992@googlegroups.com>
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 2:43:59 PM UTC-6, AdaMagica wrote:
> So was I. But you cannot use a renaming as a parent of a further package. So there is no real way to mix two package trees.
>
>
> package Shadow.Child.Grandchild is ...
> 1:1 parent unit cannot be a renaming
>
> That's at least what GNAT GPL 2013 says. I didn't check what the RM says.
Is there an ARM section for that? I can't seem to find it if there is, and it seems rather an arbitrary limitation, so I'd like to see it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-01 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-30 7:00 "shadow" package hierarchy using renaming of child packages Oliver Kellogg
2013-06-30 20:43 ` AdaMagica
2013-07-01 1:34 ` Shark8 [this message]
2013-07-01 5:46 ` J-P. Rosen
2013-07-01 16:31 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-01 8:29 ` Oliver Kellogg
2013-07-01 9:37 ` AdaMagica
2013-07-01 11:14 ` Oliver Kellogg
2013-07-01 8:21 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox