From: Olivier Henley <olivier.henley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Performance of many concurrent delay() calls
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2016-11-07T11:13:48-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f167c3e-db54-4c50-be12-5809b7944a18@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a375eea-b087-4080-a492-62bc26a8123c@googlegroups.com>
Ok but sometimes such pratice are a general nono. I am only looking for a rule of thumb here; I am on a relatively safe side or I am just insane to even think about such solution.
Thx.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-07 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-07 18:52 Performance of many concurrent delay() calls Olivier Henley
2016-11-07 19:04 ` J-P. Rosen
2016-11-07 19:13 ` Olivier Henley [this message]
2016-11-07 20:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-11-07 21:30 ` Florian Weimer
2016-11-07 22:42 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-11-09 15:50 ` Olivier Henley
2016-11-09 23:15 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox