From: rmeenaks@olf.com
Subject: Re: INMOS Transputer
Date: 1999/04/09
Date: 1999-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7em3hn$dr8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7egmm4$tlr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <7egmm4$tlr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com> wrote:
> In article <7ebpp7$ruc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
> rmeenaks@olf.com wrote:
>
> > Did you get any PD/GPL version for the transputers (GNAT
> > maybe).
>
> As far as I know, the transputer remains one of the few
> architectures for which a GCC port has not been done (it
> is an elegant though VERY unconventional architecture).
> Thus a GNAT port is unrealistic at the moment.
>
No. There is a port of GCC to the transputers. Actually several ports. The
last port was GCC 2.7.2. It can be found on my webpage at
http://members.tripod.com/transputer. Another older port was done for the
Helios Operating System. There exists yet another port called tracc (a rare
one, very very difficult to find) which is GCC 1.?.? I have a copy, but never
looked at it. The GCC 2.7.2 code isn't really optimized too well though.
Ram
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-04 0:00 INMOS Transputer Harry Tucker
1999-04-04 0:00 ` Peter Dencker
1999-04-04 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-04-06 0:00 ` rmeenaks
1999-04-06 0:00 ` Tristan Gingold
1999-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-09 0:00 ` rmeenaks [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox