From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: INMOS Transputer
Date: 1999/04/07
Date: 1999-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7egmm4$tlr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ebpp7$ruc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <7ebpp7$ruc$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
rmeenaks@olf.com wrote:
> Did you get any PD/GPL version for the transputers (GNAT
> maybe).
As far as I know, the transputer remains one of the few
architectures for which a GCC port has not been done (it
is an elegant though VERY unconventional architecture).
Thus a GNAT port is unrealistic at the moment.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-04 0:00 INMOS Transputer Harry Tucker
1999-04-04 0:00 ` Peter Dencker
1999-04-04 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-04-06 0:00 ` rmeenaks
1999-04-06 0:00 ` Tristan Gingold
1999-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1999-04-09 0:00 ` rmeenaks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox