From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with Scope of aliased Objects
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-04-16T09:01:06-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e8384b9-f3eb-473e-bf04-1207c6212799@v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 605b4fb5-2be1-42c7-b8d6-11d0b6098a82@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com
On Apr 16, 8:50 am, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Why don't you pass the outer array as an "in out" parameter to your
> subprogram and let the subprogram write directly into the array?
I get the impression that the OP wanted an array of class-wide types,
so this won't work.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 13:43 Problems with Scope of aliased Objects patrick.gunia
2009-04-16 15:29 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-04-16 15:59 ` patrick.gunia
2009-04-16 16:26 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-04-16 16:37 ` patrick.gunia
2009-04-16 20:11 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-04-16 15:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-04-16 19:12 ` sjw
2009-04-16 15:50 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-04-16 16:01 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2009-04-16 16:12 ` patrick.gunia
2009-04-17 13:53 ` Alex R. Mosteo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox