From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Handling Addressing Errors
Date: 1999/03/21
Date: 1999-03-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d1ije$c7g$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7cttko$348$1@plug.news.pipex.net
In article <7cttko$348$1@plug.news.pipex.net>,
"Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> I think Charles' query with the RM95 is largely addressed
> by the AARM, if I
> may quote AARM C.6:
You may quote the AARM, but please remember that it has
no official status whatsoever, it is simply some informal
comments by the designers and writers of the RM. It may
be useful in some cases to infer intent, but it has no
official normative status. In other words, if the RM is
unclear, and the AARM is clear, then the language
definition is still unclear!
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-03 0:00 Handling Addressing Errors Charles H. Sampson
1999-03-04 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-18 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1999-03-18 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-03-19 0:00 ` Mikko Levanto
1999-03-19 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-03-20 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-02 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1999-03-18 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-03-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar [this message]
1999-03-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-04 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox