From: Larry <lhazel@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT
Date: 1999/03/15
Date: 1999-03-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cjm4g$avo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3sob6broj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net
In article <m3sob6broj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>,
Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> Larry <lhazel@mindspring.com> writes:
>
> > There is a type named Class in many packages and in one procedure the
> > compiler seems to be confused about which Class is used. Here is
> > abbreviated code for that procedure:
>
> "Class" is a horrible choice for the name of a type. Why don't you just
> name the type "Fire_Mission"?
>
I agree. I inherited this code, don't understand it yet, and am trying to get
as much of it to compile as possible with minimum changes. Actually,
Fire_Mission is the name of one package in which a type Class is defined.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-15 0:00 Problem Compiling with GNAT Larry
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Larry [this message]
1999-03-16 0:00 ` fraser
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-19 0:00 ` Fraser Wilson
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Larry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox