From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.11 worth installing
Date: 1999/03/04
Date: 1999-03-04T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bmbh6$inf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 36DE4874.9FA45B71@frqnet.de
In article <36DE4874.9FA45B71@frqnet.de>,
Andreas Winckler <andreas.winckler@frqnet.de> wrote:
>
> Bruce or Tracy schrieb:
> >
> > Is GNAT 3.11 far enough better than 3.10 that it is worth installing?
>
> We used GNAT 3.11 on a Sun Sparc 5 to compile our software for X.25
> communication. The software uses very intensive the Ada tasking and
> exception handling features. With GNAT 3.11 the software crashes
> uncontrolled with a segmentation fault (core dump).
I hope you are looking into why this is happening, rather than just throwing
up your hands and blaming the compiler. Odds are there's something non-kosher
in the code. It could even be a timing problem that the new compiler just
causes to happen sooner!
T.E.D.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-03 0:00 GNAT 3.11 worth installing Bruce or Tracy
1999-03-03 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-03-03 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-03-04 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-04 0:00 ` dewar
1999-03-04 0:00 ` dennison [this message]
1999-03-05 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-05 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-06 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-03-08 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-09 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1999-03-05 0:00 ` robert_dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox